赵立坚关于你的第一个问题，中方认为，有关欧盟和日本之间的沟通与合作应该有利于促进地区稳定和发展，有利于促进全球供应链稳定畅通。当前形势下，各方应致力团结，推动开放合作，共同维护世界经济体制、规则、基础的稳定，要坚持开放而不隔绝、融合而不脱钩，共同努力促进世界经济稳定复苏。我还要强调的是，欧盟和日本峰会是他们双方之间的事。他们不能拿中国说事，更不能干涉中国内部事务。

Zhao Lijian On your first question, China believes that relevant communication and cooperation between the EU and Japan should be conducive to regional stability and development, and to the steady and smooth operation of the global supply chain. Under the current circumstances, all sides should stay united, promote openness and cooperation, and jointly safeguard stability of world economic system, rules and foundation. We need to pursue openness instead of isolation, and seek integration rather than decoupling to jointly strive for steady recovery of the world economy. I also want to stress that the EU-Japan summit is between the two sides. China should not be made an issue, still less should China’s internal affairs be interfered in.

《环球时报》记者昨天，“全球发展倡议之友小组”高级别视频会议举行，“之友小组”成员国高级别代表及联合国秘书长、多个联合国发展机构负责人出席。据称，美国在会前对多个联合国发展机构施压，企图阻挠有关人员与会。请问中方对此有何评论？

Global Times The High-Level Virtual Meeting of the Group of Friends of the Global Development Initiative (GDI) was held yesterday. High-level representatives from members of the Group of Friends, UN Secretary-General, heads of UN development agencies attended the meeting. It is reported that the US exerted pressure on multiple UN development agencies, trying to obstruct their attendance. Does China have any comment?

刚才你提到，美国向相关联合国机构施压，这是美国大搞“胁迫外交”的又一例证。美方口口声声说支持国际发展合作，实际上却在背后搞小动作，干扰破坏国际社会推动可持续发展的努力。这说明他们根本不关心发展中国家发展，而是只关心维护自身霸权。胁迫外交改变不了各国人民对共同发展的执着追求，阻挡不了各方加强国际发展合作、共同推动人类发展事业的历史潮流。我们奉劝美方认清历史发展大势，多做有利于全球发展、有利于各国人民福祉的事。

The US pressuring on relevant UN agencies you mentioned is just another example of US-style “coercive diplomacy”. While claiming to support international development cooperation, the US is in fact playing tricks by stealth, obstructing and undermining the international community’s efforts to promote sustainable development. This shows that the US does not care about the development of developing countries, but its hegemony only. Coercive diplomacy cannot change the persistent pursuit of common development by people of all countries or hold back the historical trend of enhancing international development cooperation and jointly advancing the cause of human development. We urge the US to get a clear understanding of the trend of history, and do more to promote global development and the well-being of people around the world. 

深圳卫视记者上月，美国助理国务卿尼科尔斯称，美国不打算邀请古巴、尼加拉瓜、委内瑞拉领导人出席6月在洛杉矶举行的美洲国家首脑会议。对此，墨西哥总统洛佩斯在访问古巴期间表示，他将要求美国领导人在不排除任何一个国家的情况下举办会议。请问中方对此有何评论？

Shenzhen TV US Assistant Secretary of State Brian Nichols said last month he does not expect that the US would invite leaders of Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela to June’s Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles. We noted that in response, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said during his visit to Cuba that he would ask the US leader not to exclude any country from the Summit. Does China have any comment?

从美国提出“门罗主义”算起，到明年就200年了。2个世纪以来，美国表面上说的是“美洲是美洲人的美洲”，实际上做的是“美洲是美国人的美洲”。美国将拉美视作后院，不是尽心扶助，而是随意霸凌，不仅自身的发展繁荣没有惠及拉美，反而对拉美大肆盘剥、滥施制裁、输出通胀，搞政治干预、政权颠覆、暗杀政要乃至武装侵略。时至今日，美国仍不顾国际社会和地区国家的反对，执意维持对部分拉美国家的单边非法制裁。这与拉美国家与其他国家合作谋求发展的正当举动完全是背道而驰。美方对拉美国家缺乏应有的基本尊重。

Next year will mark the 200th anniversary of the enunciation of Monroe Doctrine. Over the past two centuries, the US has been talking about “America for the Americans”. But what it did shows that “Americans” in the expression refer to the people of the United States of America only. Taking Latin America as its own backyard, the US didn’t commit itself to helping Latin America, but wantonly bullied it. Instead of benefiting Latin America with its own development and prosperity, the US has brought Latin America wanton exploitation, willful sanctions, inflation, political interference, regime change, assassination of politicians and even armed aggression. Even till this day, despite the opposition of the international community and regional countries, the US is still bent on sustaining the unilateral and illegal sanctions on some Latin American countries. All this is at odds with Latin American countries' pursuit of development through cooperation with other countries. The US lacks basic respect for Latin American countries.